Benchmarks
45 benchmarks in 8 domains
Literature
Protocol
4 models
| # | Model ↕ | Mean rank ▲ | Coverage ↕ | BC5CDR chemical NER ↕ | PubMedQA accuracy ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low coverage: below 2 of 2, or nothing to compare with. Listed, not ranked. | |||||
| — | bio-nlp/biogpt-large overlap | 0.00 | 1/2 | · | 0.622 (1) * |
| — | bio-nlp/biomedical-ner-all | 0.00 | 1/2 | 0.541 (1) | · |
| — | bio-nlp/bert-base-uncased-clinical-ner | 1.00 | 1/2 | 0.430 (2) | · |
| — | bio-nlp/biomedlm overlap | 1.00 | 1/2 | · | 0.508 (2) * |
No model matches these filters.
Each cell is the model's value on that benchmark's board, with its rank there in brackets, as the benchmark's own leaderboard ranks it (its primary zero-shot metric, at its default version); hover for the 95% interval, n and source, click to open that board. A * marks a declared train/test overlap. Rows are ordered by mean normalised rank, (rank − 1) / (board size − 1) averaged over the benchmarks the model has a result on (a board of one entry does not count): ranks, never values, so no average mixes units. Filtering hides rows without re-ranking anyone.